This self-assessment tool helps organizations determine whether their HR systems are truly Fit-for-Purpose—meaning your workforce and HR programs are fully aligned with your mission and are built to support it.
Achieving Fit-for-Purpose means your HR systems are not only aligned, but also adaptive—designed to foster motivation, equity, and validation across your workforce. At the same time, they clearly demonstrate value to both internal and external stakeholders, including staff, leadership, and the board.
Curious to know the state of your workforce? Take the assessment to uncover your HR effectiveness score—and see where your HR function stands.
Our Principles, Policies, and Tools framework offers a clear roadmap for fair, consistent, and transparent workforce management. These practices are essential for attracting, motivating, and retaining talent. In a rapidly evolving aid landscape, clear criteria for hiring, rewards, and performance management help strengthen organizational cohesion, accountability, and trust—both internally and with donors and funders.
Every organization takes its own path to effective workforce management. Our Community Magazine highlights stories of how different organizations, in partnership with us, have tackled challenges and improved workforce effectiveness.
Competition within the multilateral banking and international organization community is demanding. Although smaller, CDB competes directly with institutions like the World Bank and the United Nations in the same countries. Its biggest challenge in setting salaries for internationally recruited staff is attracting and retaining senior-level employees. To remain competitive and effectively serve the Caribbean, CDB has refined its compensation strategy by closely monitoring comparator institutions. By giving greater weight to salary data from other development banks for senior roles, CDB has better aligned its compensation progression with key competitors. Since adopting this approach, CDB has maintained its critical market position cost-effectively by focusing on these essential roles.
Across the UN system, there was no direct link between job evaluation and performance appraisal. Appraisals were based on cascading work objectives, linking individual staff measures to broader unit and organizational goals, but these were seen as unwieldy and time-consuming. The solution was a revised job evaluation system that replaced the traditional point-rating method with a values-based approach. This system established grade and factor values to reflect the unique demands at each level. To align with performance appraisals, complementary performance values were introduced, creating a grade-based framework with consistent measures for all staff.
The inaugural edition of the Community Magazine: Birches Group’s Publication on Issues of Workforce Management is now available! This space is dedicated to bringing news, insights, and strategies on equity in workforce management within international development.
We’re excited to deliver the latest updates, practical strategies, and thought leadership designed to foster equitable workplaces. Don’t miss our exclusive interviews with management experts, who share unique perspectives and actionable steps for advancing equity and fairness in HR within organizations around the world.
Thank you for signing up!
Click the link below to explore the very first issue!